Here, Merry Christmas. Write this down for future ammunition. Larry Kramer thinks Lincoln was gay. Here's an article about it. I go to Google, I type "Lincoln gay" without the quotes, and click the first thing on the list. Then once I have the name, I search it on Wikipedia, and suddenly I have a bio and a pic.

Voilà! Something more than a grunt and a scowl...

i don't remember who it was it was like 5 years ago.

so i don't think i can look it up



as for my writing skills and respect i have treated everyone on here with respect until they said something that was totally wrong. such as dictator col. gene trying to tell me how i should think and feel. Sean who wanted to ban me because i disagreed with him. actually i agreed with him i just wanted to include everyone quilty of what he was only blaming bush for. and gid who attacks my spelling and at the same time doing his own misspelling of simply words.


now then i am probable the most evil person on the planet but i try not to act on my impulses

The Intimate World of Abraham Lincoln, the controversial new book by C.A. Tripp, argues that the Great Emancipator was gay. But close readers won't be surprised by this assertion: Incontrovertible evidence of Lincoln's homosexuality is all over his other biographies.

"He was always ... writing poetry." (Lincoln, by David Herbert Donald, Page 33)

"[T]hey noted ... how affectionate he was to kittens and other pets." (Lincoln, Page 55)

WWW Link

ok so from these to excerpts from this book all men who write poetry are gay

and all men who are affectionate with kittens and other pets are also gay


i didn't read the entire page but you see what i am saying

i am not saying that he was or wasn't gay the only one who knows is him and he isn't talking any more.

I think most of those quotes were more jokes than proof. Look at the link I posted above and they get into Lincoln's relationship with Speed. I don't believe he was gay, but given I'm no real fan of Lincoln I wouldn't be crushed if the diary and letters really do exist and prove it.

No, I called you a bigot because you essentially advocated for the extermination of 1/5 of the world's population, danielost. Your rhetoric was eerily reminiscent of that of Hitler in pre WWII Germany. This only further reinforces my assertion that you are a moron, because you couldn't even READ MY RESPONSE in the proper context!

No, I did NOT attack your spelling, danielost. I attacked GRAMMAR and SYNTAX. Again, you are misguided. The one who wrote the article criticizing your spelling was another individual entirely.

First, you lie when you say my writing is full of misspellings. I'll give you a couple of typos, no problem, but as a rule my spelling is pretty much on the level. I tend to prefer British spellings, which American spellcheckers do not like, but if you know your history, they were common spellings in the US until Teddy Roosevelt began a campaign to get rid of them (and, yes, I know..."danielost" and "spellcheckers" will show up as misspelled words in your spellchecker, but the former is your name, and the latter is a computer term).

Second, again, let's get back to the point. You made an assertion, I countered it and gave you a MOUNTAIN of evidence to support my position, you called me a liar and told me the government was hiding the "real" Constitution from Americans and would not POSSIBLY post that stuff on the Internet. How credible does that make you? Really? IN all this time, my conflict with you could have been resolved by your simply admitting you were wrong, which is not a difficult task.

You want to know why your posts don't get the attention they deserve, danielost? Because you don't engage in meaningful debate. When someone differs with you, SUPPORT your position, don't speak in generalities and unsupported assumptions. Learning involves discovery, even when it means discovery that you are wrong.

But you're only going to bother reading 5-6 words of this reply and will miss the entire point, so I've wasted enough words as it is.

when did i advocate the extermination of 1/5 of the worlds population.

what i said is that the Muslim people are dangerous because they want to kill us or convert us

i suppose then you would attack Einstein because he couldn't add 2 plus 2.

Ah, so you support the allegedly murderous agenda of 'the Muslim people'?

Anyway, what's so bad about conversion? It's not like you have to join them, you know.

OK, abstract thought time.

If this statement were true (which it is not true of Muslims in general), then what can be done? Taken to its logical conclusion, the ONLY thing one can conclude from your statements would be the eradication of Muslims.

What you are saying encourages violence against Muslims no matter how often you try to deny it. If the Muslim next door plans to kill me, it's only logical that I kill him back first.

Don't forget forcible conversion. So that leaves us killing or converting the people that we imagine are set upon killing or converting us. Isn't it amazing how hate manifests itself in universal ways, whether it is radical Muslims in Iran or their foils in America?

When we have to stoop to making ourselves into the evil to accomplish eradicating an evil, well, we've defeated the purpose.



He couldn't? Link, maybe? I think addition is a prerequisite for complex calculus. Things like that show that you are really not driven by your own discovery, but myth and rumor. Dangerous things to use to decide something like the the threat posed by your neighbors.

no link necessary it is a well known fact that Einstein flunked math in school because it was too simple for him

So, it is a well-known fact that Einstien couldn't add 2+2? Odd, I've seen documentaries, read a a biography, and so far no one that studied the man said he couldn't add.

So you really think it is a well-known fact? Seems neither well-known, nor a fact. Just like it is a well-known fact that supposedly Muslims either want to kill you or convert you. Can you feel yourself digging a deeper hole every time you open your mouth?

I'm calling you a liar. Show me he couldn't add 2+2.

ee cummings maybe?

in Just-
spring when the world is mus-
limuscious the little lame marroondan

bristles far and wee


cuz a bunchadamnliberals
make him lose his marbles and
ply conspiracies and it's
spring


when the world is befuddlin-dumberful


them queers make
good ol buffoondan bluster
far and wee
and bettyanlisberal come dictatin


from blog-watch and rump-jope and


it's
spring
and
the
goat-eatin


majounDan misspells
far
and
wee

LMAO...

That's a masterpiece, KB.

OK i was wrong about Einstein

was for the shift key my pinkies are not able to hit it properly. sorry