This is my personal view and comments on the issues and events that I feel a need to talk about or express my view. You don't have to agree, but lets carry on a adult, discussion and maybe you will see it the right way, mine. ;)
and some other things of interest..
Published on July 1, 2008 By ShadowWar In US Domestic

John McCain has a few things that are not generally known. One of which is he has a Son serving in Iraq in the Marines. That to me makes the mans judgment on Iraq and things like it, more cautious and careful, exactly what I want. If a man is willing to put his own son in danger, then he must have a really good reason.

In addition, It is being kept very quiet, for obvious reasons, but he is serving in Iraq right now. And I found out some other very interesting stuff, had to get it from Israel but found it:

How aware is the public that McCain has raised seven children? Or that he adopted his two oldest sons as small boys (children from his wife's prior marriage)? Or that he has raised a Bangladeshi girl with severe health problems adopted from Mother Theresa's orphanage? Or that his own sons have served in the military, including in Iraq?

It's widely known that McCain, a Navy pilot, was shot down, captured and tortured by the North Vietnamese for 5 and a half years - an episode worth a forthcoming column all its own. But few are aware that he refused early release until all the POWs captured before him were freed, and that he refused special treatment offered once it was discovered that he was the "crown prince" (the son of the admiral in charge of the Pacific Fleet) because he wouldn't provide the enemy with any propaganda victories.

Even fewer seem to know that those years were a fraction of a 22-year Navy career. Although broken and battered, after his release from Vietnamese captivity he went right back to the Navy, where he continued to serve for an additional eight years.

Now to me that shows quite a bit of character. Personal character and honor.

And this hit home with me:

Anyone can talk about "supporting our troops"; the McCain’s serve. McCain's father and grandfather were respected American admirals. Of McCain's four sons, three have gone the military route. One was a Navy pilot like his father, one enlisted in the Marines at age 17 and recently completed a tour in Iraq, and one is completing his education at the Naval Academy (raising the strong possibility that, for the first time in half a century, the United States will have a president with a son at war).

Yet, likely because of those same values, McCain maintains a strict code of silence about his sons' military service, no matter how legitimate his pride or politically useful their military status. Through 2007, McCain was the strongest Senate advocate of vastly increasing troop levels in Iraq, strongly influencing the administration's wildly successful "surge" strategy.

Yet McCain never brought up his own son's service in some of the roughest areas of Iraq. His principled refusal of political advantage from his son's Iraq service extends to refusal even to be interviewed on the subject, or to introduce his son to campaign audiences.

All of that is verifiable and accurate. I have checked. I was impressed with his family and his compassion enough to adopt a child with special needs. And all the other stuff I found out was very eye opening. What made me even more impressed was his refusal to use any of that to further his campaign. Interesting information to say the least.

What do you think? Did you know about these things?

 

 


Comments
on Jul 01, 2008
Yes, I was aware. The McCain's are a very private family. At one point, his son returned from Iraq and attended a McCain rally or event that same day and no one pointed out that he was there or that he had just returned from that war, and the family prefers it that way. Unlike so many others, McCain doesn't exploit his family for political gain, even though he easily could. While I have a lot of issues with some of his stands, I have nothing but great respect for his conduct as far as his family goes.
on Jul 01, 2008
I have nothing but great respect for his conduct as far as his family goes.


I have nothing but great respect for his conduct as far as his family goes (at least after about 1980 and the whole cheating on his first wife and kicking her to the curb for the rich heiress - oh, and the way he talks to his wife behind closed doors, too).
on Jul 01, 2008
A candidate's family should not be part of the campaign - as an issue or an asset. However, that is ideally, not in the real world.
on Jul 01, 2008
oh, and the way he talks to his wife behind closed doors, too).


So tell me, what business is it of yours how a persons speaks to their spouse behind closed doors? Are you a member some secret squad that invades the privacy of peoples homes to see if they are being politically correct? If his wife does not like it she is rich enough to walk out any time she wants. For all you know his talking to her the way he does is their pet code between them. Either way it is not your business. That is the problem with liberals they always want to invade your privacy and tell the world what you do behind closed doors. Once again the liberal police state is fully functional. Conservatives don’t waste their time on such pettiness.
on Jul 02, 2008

Yes, I agree, McCain is a man of honor. Its a shame we had to get two brilliant candidates running this year. When did his son return from Iraq?

on Jul 02, 2008
For all you know his talking to her the way he does is their pet code between them.


If 'cunt' is a 'pet code between them', there are some other serious issues I have with his character.
on Jul 02, 2008
If 'cunt' is a 'pet code between them', there are some other serious issues I have with his character.


You have yet to explain why it is any of your business. There was a joke I was told years ago that may help you understand.

A bird was up north and when the other birds left for warmer areas down south this bird stayed to enjoy the food with less competition. The weather turned cold and he headed south but by the time he reached Pennsylvania it was too cold to continue, its wings were frozen and he fell to earth. Landing in a barnyard he chided himself for not leaving with the other birds. Too cold to move it sat in the barnyard waiting to die. A cow walked past the bird not seeing it lifted its tail and crapped on the poor bird. Oh the indignities of having to die covered in shit. But the crap was warm and soon thawed its wings and warmed the bird up. It was so happy that it might be able to finish the flight down south that it began to sing.

A cat hearing the chirping left the barn to investigate finding the pile of dung the cat dug through it to find the bird. The cat killed and ate the bird.

The moral of the story is: not everyone that shits on you is your enemy. Not everyone that gets you out of shit is your friend. And if you are warm and happy in a pile of shit keep your mouth shut!

Just because the words used between husband and wife are not the words you choose to use does not make it right or wrong. You are not in that marriage. The fact that you feel you have any say in how he speaks to his wife or how she speaks to him is still not your business. I am sure that when I call my girlfriends filthy slut or cock sucker would offend you as well but it is still none of your business. My wife has no objection to how I speak to her or them, neither do my girlfriends why is it your business? More important, why do you care?

I can understand if the wife complained but you have no evidence of this, or at least you have not provided any. When Mr. Clinton was fooling around on his wife I did not care until he lied about it in a court of law. When Mr. Kennedy fooled around on his wife I did not care either and since it was not a matter for the courts I still don’t care and both husband and wife are dead. Why is it that you have to take issue of what happens between a man and his wife?

P.S.

When Mr. Clinton was being impeached for lying in a court of law, people on the left defended him by saying it was a personal matter, with no relation to his government duties. We on the right were lambasted for peeking into bedrooms and minding other peoples business. I now see the conviction of their beliefs! When it is politically advantageous for them they make up lies to justify bad behavior, and when it is politically advantageous for them they peek into bedrooms, and mind other peoples business with “moral outrage”. Face facts, if that is possible, you have no morals and you are never outraged unless it serves your political goals.

Remember Senator Packwood? Forced out of office because a woman did not like the fact that he kissed her. The moral outrage that some old white guy would force a kiss upon a woman showed how bad republicans were. Years later President Clinton gropes a woman in the oval office and it is a private matter. He has sex with a subordinate, in violation of federal law, and it is a private matter.
Once again they have moral outrage because a man does not speak to his wife in a way they are able to disapprove of. It is not that they really disapprove it is that it is a way of attacking their political enemy. They are not outraged at the act they are outraged because he is a republican and they are not.
on Jul 05, 2008
Once again S.C. has wandered in, passed gas, and then complained of the smell and staggered off. I guess he is sure he does not need to defend his moral outrage or issues with the character of the Senator now that it was shown that he is a hypocrite.

on Aug 26, 2008

I did know about the prisonor of war chapter of his life. I did not know anything about his children. Maybe HE should have his daughter do a cutsie routie for the cameras too as Nobama did.

 

The man has integrity and experience. But who wants that when the other guy smiles a lot and ummm and ahhh, oh yea goes to the other side of the world to campain. Thank God the Germans like Obama.