I tell it like it is. It is you and other JoeUsers that assign the term "Bush Bashing" to the facts I report.

You tell it like the NYT and moveon.org tells it to you. Your "facts" are constantly proven to be either false, or taken way out of context.

drmiler I tell it like it is. It is you and other JoeUsers that assign the term "Bush Bashing" to the facts I report.

Then I would suggest that you talk to "deference" who usually goes "against" Bush in general and who has said basically the same thing.

That is because Bush had to go to a war that DID NOT NEED to be fought! I agree with that statement Col. Gene but I'll tell you - the thread Drmiler posted a scant fifteen days ago personally addressing you was luck. Pure luck. I had very much considered posting a thread addressing you at about the same time - it wouldn't have been nearly as mild as Drmiler's. You need to change your approach. Learn to temper your rhetoric, even... I and most of the other JU regulars (who continually go back and forth in our, um...rather spirited debates) have realized the need to treat each other as more then an anonymous poster designed to be ranted at for our convenience. If you have a message, a mission, an agenda, kindly keep in mind that on the other end of the line exists another user; just as human and feverishly tapping away their important opinion. Sometimes you'll get a 'def. brn!' or a 'drmiler oneliner' or even the occasional 'Take the Baker-Shoot-Your-Point-All-To-Hell-Street' but remember that only temporary residence here at JU allows one to shoot one's mouth off regardless of fact and consideration for other bloggers. To stick around one must be a little more...substantive - humane, even. You don't want that old 'send the Col Gene bot after him' moniker all your stay here do you? Or will you pass from us soon?

Or stevendedalus

#16 by stevendedalus Saturday, January 07, 2006 I'll guarantee that the col isn't poking fun. He was serious. A given, he definitely needs to lighten up and get off the kick of Bush-bashing.

Get a clue will ya? If you can't afford one....I'll purchase one for you.

Most of my facts come from U S Government agencies. I have also used articles from other publications as well. The data I use is correct but the Bushies call it Bush Bashing. A good example is what has happened to the Annual Deficit and the National debt since Jan 2001. 1000 of 1000 people would most likely say the past 5 years have been very bad for our future. That is an example of what JoeUsers would call Bush bashing. I guess that is how you must view the impact of the tax and spending policies we have been following! Reflecting that 3 million people illegally crossed our southern border would also be considered Bush bashing. The 1 million additional Americans that lost healthcare during the past 5 years would also be Bush bashing to JoeUsers. The slaughter in Iraq and the deaths since the last election is most definitely Bush Bashing. The fact we are more dependent of foreign oil today is absolutely Bush bashing.

I think I count as one of the 1000, and I think I am better off over the last 5 years. I make more money, I feel the laws have improved for my protection (I live in Fla) and I feel better that our military is fighting the terrorist in Iraq and not the streets of New York. SO I guess your wrong on that count. Anyone else?

The southern border IS a problem and I agree with you on that. SO your point there? No one said we agree 100% with all of the Administrations policies or doings. You are the only one against ALL of them. Thats what makes the difference. ANd no offense, we are more dependent on foreign oil because some people in our government will not allow drilling in certain areas that should be opened up for oil drilling. ANWR, Florida Gulf and other areas.

Anything else? I pay less taxes, make more money and feel safer at home from the terrorist. How about anyone else of the 1000?? Want to chime in?

Most of my facts come from U S Government agencies

No, most of your facts come from you ass.  As has been PROVED.  Doc Miler is trying to be nice.  I would suggest you listen to him for a change.  If that is even remotely possible any longer for your hate atrophied brain.

Most of my facts come from U S Government agencies. I have also used articles from other publications as well. The data I use is correct but the Bushies call it Bush Bashing. A good example is what has happened to the Annual Deficit and the National debt since Jan 2001. 1000 of 1000 people would most likely say the past 5 years have been very bad for our future. That is an example of what JoeUsers would call Bush bashing. I guess that is how you must view the impact of the tax and spending policies we have been following! Reflecting that 3 million people illegally crossed our southern border would also be considered Bush bashing. The 1 million additional Americans that lost healthcare during the past 5 years would also be Bush bashing to JoeUsers. The slaughter in Iraq and the deaths since the last election is most definitely Bush Bashing. The fact we are more dependent of foreign oil today is absolutely Bush bashing.

We don't care "where" you get your facts from. It's "really" not important. The problem is that "you" find NOTHING good coming from GW. All we EVER hear from you is "Bush, baaaaaad"! Grow up!
Yes we would call this Bush bashing. And do you know why? As if you even care. We would call it bashing because there is NO proof, only opinion! Not even a poll was sited. That would be a first for you. Please grow a brain! You know something? I REALLY hated "dabe"! But you are faaaaaar worse than she ever was. At least her rhetoric had some thinking behind it. Yours on the other hand rarely does! As long as it's bad for Bush, you'll print it. Which is probably why your book didn't have a stellar performance!

Once again Colon Gangrene takes an article that has nothing to do with Prs. Bush, and makes it a "Bush Bash".

The point, unless I missed it, was what troops in Iraq have to say about the body armor. Their opinion seems to matter to some of us, but apparently the opinions are as meaningless to the mighty Colon as the troops themselves.

I, for one, thank you ShadowWar, for bringing these quotes to our attention. I know it isn't the opinion of every troop in country, but it's nice to hear from them once in awhile.

I feel better that our military is fighting the terrorist in Iraq and not the streets of New York.

Oh, PLEASE! Let's not get carried away.

Oh, PLEASE! Let's not get carried away.

Yeah, becuase terrorists would never hit New York. :~D

Reply By: stevendedalusPosted: Tuesday, January 10, 2006I feel better that our military is fighting the terrorist in Iraq and not the streets of New York.Oh, PLEASE! Let's not get carried away.

Oh ya thats right that, New York would never be attacked. Your right. No bombs in the parking garage of the Wolrd Trade Center, No airplanes flown into them, no attacks on American Soil would ever happen. And what shows you lack any type of solid discussion point is that you chose that one line out of the entire post to respond too?? Please you'll have to do better. Its a fact, we have killed more terrorist and and thier ilk in Iraq than died on 9/11 attacking us here. Its a fact we have prevented the following:
1. The West Coast Airliner Plot: In mid-2002 the U.S. disrupted a plot to attack targets on the West Coast of the United States using hijacked airplanes. The plotters included at least one major operational planner involved in planning the events of 9/11.
2. The East Coast Airliner Plot: In mid-2003 the U.S. and a partner disrupted a plot to attack targets on the East Coast of the United States using hijacked commercial airplanes.
3. The Jose Padilla Plot: In May 2002 the U.S. disrupted a plot that involved blowing up apartment buildings in the United States. One of the plotters, Jose Padilla, also discussed the possibility of using a "dirty bomb" in the U.S.

Tell the 3000 plus that died that New York could never be attacked. We have already had 1 failed suicide bomber attempt in the US. Hey I know lets invite them to come here and go to your neighborhood and use IED's and VBIED's. then lets see who changes thier song.

Col, as I have said before. You can post a number or statistic from anywhere and you simply apply it to Bush. You do not take that "statistic" and find any other reason behind it except for "blame Bush".

Even the liberals here on JU think you are full of it.

This reminds me somebody.

All the data from my post 18 come from U S Government data. This data is about the basic economic and fiscal policies of this country. Bush has been successful in getting his policies passed by Congress. Who would you like to hold responsible for the Results? George Washington!

I would not want our Military to be fighting Terrorists in New York. However the Iraq War has not reduced that possibility!

#27 by Island Dog Tuesday, January 10, 2006

Where did you get that! That is priceless!