This is my personal view and comments on the issues and events that I feel a need to talk about or express my view. You don't have to agree, but lets carry on a adult, discussion and maybe you will see it the right way, mine. ;)
But what about the soldier, do you know his name???
Published on May 30, 2006 By ShadowWar In War on Terror

Now I know everyone is just very upset that a female reporter was injured and 2 others killed in an IED blast. I am also sure many are aware that a soldier and civilian contractor died in the same blast. But what ALL the stories fail to mention is that in that same time frame:

BAGHDAD, Iraq – Coalition forced detained one wanted terrorist and two suspects at approximately May 28 in the vicinity of Taji.  The troops detained two suspects who surrendered immediately, while a third suspect tried to escape by jumping into a nearby canal. 
 
Once all three men were in the custody of the forces, the two compliant suspects identified the third man, who attempted to flee, as the terrorist for whom the troops were searching. 
 
The terrorist’s vehicle was destroyed on site.
 
OR
 
BAGHDAD, Iraq – Coalition forces captured seven terrorists and various bomb making materials while conducting multiple assaults in southern Ramadi May 28.  The terrorists are known for improvised explosive device and vehicle borne improvised explosive device production in the region.
 
    The troops located and detonated a VBIED and several IED making materials on location.  Coalition forces encountered no resistance from the suspected terrorists during the raid.  This location is the same area that six other suspected terrorists were apprehended last Friday for attacking Coalition forces conducting similar operations.
 
    The raids were part of ongoing, coordinated efforts to eliminate al-Qaeda operations in the Al Anbar region west of Baghdad. 
 
    There were several women and children on the scene of the raids.  None were harmed and all were returned to their homes once the troops ensured the area and buildings were secure.
 
You heard about the riots in Afghanistan over the accident involving a US military vehicle, but what you did not hear was:
 
BAGRAM AIRFIELD, Afghanistan – Enemy extremists attacked Afghan National Security and Coalition forces in the Kajaki District in Helmand Province Sunday night, but the attack was repelled, forcing the enemy to retreat.

Coalition aircraft then tracked the more than 30 enemy fighters where they gathered at a known Taliban compound in the village of Kajaki Sofla and destroyed it with close air support.  No civilian casualties were observed during the early Sunday morning operation.

Several news reports mistakenly reported that this attack occurred today around 10 a.m, Monday.  The strike actually occurred early Sunday evening around 8 p.m.  There have been no air strikes in Kajaki District today.

The target of the strike was a courtyard on the compound.  There have been media reports that a mosque was hit in the strike.   However, the Coalition has no reports or other information to substantiate that claim.

During the past week, enemies of Afghanistan have claimed responsibility for several attacks that injured civilians and government officials.

“Afghan National Army and Coalition forces will continue to mount a decisive campaign against Taliban and other enemy fighters who bring harm to the Afghan people,” said Lt. Col. Paul Fitzpatrick, Combined Joint Task Force – 76 spokesman.  “Taliban and anti-government leaders have two choices - reconcile with the Afghan government and its people or face elimination.”
 
Here is what happened with the vehicle crash that started all that rioting:
 
A Coalition vehicle convoy heading through Kabul this morning was involved in a serious multi-vehicle accident at a busy intersection just outside downtown Kabul .

The accident occurred at about 8 a.m. this morning when a large cargo truck apparently experienced a mechanical failure, striking as many as 12 civilian vehicles.  Initial reports were that one civilian was killed and at least six injured in the accident.

U.S. soldiers at the scene immediately provided medical assistance to the injured.   The injured were taken to local hospitals for treatment.  Afghan national security forces also reported to the accident scene.

When the gathering crowd became hostile, the Coalition vehicles attempted to move out of the area to reduce tensions.   A second military convoy came to help the first convoy, and they departed the area taking the damaged vehicle with them.  Afghan security forces remained to handle crowd control.

The Coalition is conducting a full investigation regarding this incident.  There have been reports of gunfire at the scene.  There are indications that at least one Coalition military vehicle fired warning shots over the crowd.  We will determine the facts regarding the incident and cooperate fully with Afghan authorities.

In accordance with appropriate polices, compensation will be paid to those who are entitled.  At this time, we are still determining the facts of what happened, but we will provide updates as soon as that information is available.

This was a tragic incident and we deeply regret any deaths or injuries resulting from this incident.

Although this incident is very regrettable, the Coalition remains committed to working together with the people of Afghanistan to build a better future.
 
So now you see what the real problem is. You don't get the full story from the MSM. You only get bits and pieces. If you knew the whole tory on many of these things you might actually realize things are not as the MS would have you believe. Read for yourself and make up your own mind... By the way do you know the name of the Solider killed in the same VBIED attack that killed the camera crew and injured the other news reporter? I didn't think so, FYI its.......
 
 


Comments
on May 30, 2006
So now you see what the real problem is. You don't get the full story from the MSM. You only get bits and pieces.


Just like someone here I know.
on May 30, 2006

Just like someone here I know.

Me??

on May 30, 2006
No, not at all.
on May 30, 2006
25th ID lost a Soldier at NTC a couple of weeks ago. While I'm not a fan of the Iraq war, I do find it odd that *where* a Soldier dies determines whether or not people are told to care. The fallen Soldier died in a vehicle accident, which is something that happens often in Iraq (and everywhere else in the world, Soldiers and civilians alike), but it's only note-worthy if it can be played off as an "Iraq war death".

Your article really illustrates that point, I think. The media decides, based on their warped criteria, what we should care about. Apparently we should fret over media reps, but the fallen Soldier is a non-person.
on May 31, 2006
I know of what you speak.  I wonder how they would be played if it was not their compatriots reporting, but real reporters.