This is my personal view and comments on the issues and events that I feel a need to talk about or express my view. You don't have to agree, but lets carry on a adult, discussion and maybe you will see it the right way, mine. ;)
They are very advanced..
Published on October 16, 2007 By ShadowWar In War on Terror

The US military has fielded a series of UAV's (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) that makes one think of futuristic wars and years in the future. But they are here and now.

The Army is training with and beginning to use a new UAV called the "Raven".

 You have to love the high tech launch system !!

The Raven is a small lightweight UAV. While the Raven looks deceptively like a remote-controlled hobby plane it is actually a high-tech device that can provide real-time footage or still images of the battlefield. The 10-day training program was conducted in Nangarhar province Oct. 5-15, 2007.

“It is a great tool,” said Army Spc. Sean M. Noel, an infantryman from Company C, 1st Battalion, 508th Parachute Infantry Regiment, 82nd Airborne Division, speaking of the Raven. “Before we go out to hit an objective, we can look at [the imaging.] To have this ability, it saves lives basically. We know what we are going up against.”

The training course consisted of both classroom time and time spent outdoors flying the Raven.

“In the morning time we try to do classroom, where we do ‘death by PowerPoint’,” said Army Cpl. Erick J. Rodas, the 173rd Airborne Brigade master trainer for the Raven. “I try to liven it up by making after lunch strictly field site.” You have to love the frankness of the Cpl. Death by PowerPoint. I'll have to remembr that one.

Then thre is the other end of the UAV spectrum the MQ9 reaper.

 Check out that load of weapons.

The photo shows the Hunter-Killer UAVReaper which is basically a predator on steroids. Fully loaded, this UAV can take out a small country’s defenses before the rest of the crew move in. The Reaper UAV used to be known as the Predator 2 or Predator B. The armament of the UAV which has a maximum ceiling of 50,000 ft include Hellfire missiles and laser guided bombs. In fact, this beast can carry over 14 Hellfire Missiles compared to 2 on the original predator. The Reaper can also remain airborne for up to 14 flight hours. Basically, the original Predator provided a testbed for this UAV technology. Once it was proven that a Predator could accurately fire hellfire missiles, it was decided that a larger version should be produced that would increase the UAV capabilities. At about the same size as an A-10 Thunderbolt, the Reaper is almost twice the size as the orginial Predator. Likewise, high-altitude and long-endurance features were added such as de-icers for the wings and a more powerful turboprop. Basically, this thing is the wave of the future.

Then there is the Predator.

Which is a lot like the Reaper but serves more as an observation platform than anything else. This you don't have to be much of a pilot to fly thee technological monsters? Check out the cockpit of the Predator:

Well wars are being fouht more and more by remote control, keeping the pilots out of harms way, when one of these are shot down, you lose the plane, but not the pilot.

 

 

 


Comments
on Oct 17, 2007
Life imitates art.  They remind me of the Terminator Series and Skynet.  Let's just hope there is always a person sitting in that seat.
on Oct 17, 2007
Hum... in T3, were there flying killer bots?
on Oct 17, 2007
I had a neighbor when stationed at Pax River that worked in a manless aircraft squadron.  My best friend's husband also worked as an engineer for a company that worked on the same thing.  I think its pretty cool myself. 
on Oct 17, 2007
Is it just me, or does the Reaper have a Motley Crue symbol on it?
on Oct 18, 2007
I had a neighbor when stationed at Pax River that worked in a manless aircraft squadron. My best friend's husband also worked as an engineer for a company that worked on the same thing. I think its pretty cool myself.


my father worked once on remotely-controlled heavy machineguns, in order to aim while the operator is safely in the tank.

Once the system to control the machinegun would be perfected, I guess it's only one step ahead to create the software to automate them..
on Oct 18, 2007
Hum... in T3, were there flying killer bots?


Yea, and they looked somewhat like these too (at the end when Kistana was injecting all the machines with Nanobots).
on Oct 18, 2007

There is some really high tech stuff just over the horizon for the military out there.

Think of it, if we have robots fighting on our side, and robots fighting on their side, and all they are blowing up or destroying are robots, that would be some way to fight a war wouldn't it. No one dies, just machines. Then how would you know you won? When all the other guys machines are destroyed? How would you take over territory? Move in machines? or People? This concept of remote controlled war brings up a whole new area of war fighting and battle ethics.

Thanks for featuring the article.

on Oct 18, 2007
When they mention UAVs, I always think of the recon/imagery aircraft first, because that's what I was first introduced to. I still remember my unexpected shock when I heard about the use of helfires on UAVs in Yemen.

Your point about battle ethics in your last comment is something that I've thought of before. While removing ourselves from the battlefield will reduce our own casualties, removing the human loss and human contact to combat may also deaden the realism of war to the decisions makers that can declare it. And I don't think that one army of robots being destroyed would end the war... those robots would then advance on the human populous, right?
on Oct 18, 2007
Is it just me, or does the Reaper have a Motley Crue symbol on it?


It's a Blue Oyster Cult symbol. Looks like it was superimposed on the photo.





on Oct 18, 2007
It's a Blue Oyster Cult symbol.


That's right. Thanks, Nitro Cruiser.