This is my personal view and comments on the issues and events that I feel a need to talk about or express my view. You don't have to agree, but lets carry on a adult, discussion and maybe you will see it the right way, mine. ;)
For those of you that think we are geting smaller..read the facts....
Published on June 2, 2005 By ShadowWar In Current Events
In an Interview with Laura Ingram Sec. of Donald Rumsfeld answered a question about the base military closings and the reported downsizing of the military in this time of added need. He set the record straight.

Transcript:
Question: And on the issue of recruiting. I know we took a day pause, I guess in our recruiting. Was it just Army recruiting? I can't remember. But where are we now on that?

Rumsfeld: Well, first of all let me -- You mentioned downsizing. We're not downsizing. We're increasing the size of the Army and the Marines and have been by some 30,000 in the active force.

What we're doing is not downsizing, as such, what we're doing is making our capabilities more capable and more agile and more lethal.

Even though the press reports downsizing, the fact is that we've had substantial excess in infrastructure and the funds from that need to be put into capabilities that can do the country some good rather than being wasted in infrastructure that requires force protection and repair and a great deal of expense that doesn't really add to the military capability of the Department of Defense. So the process it's going through, the Base Closing and Realignment, is going to make our military defense, our military capabilities much greater than they were previously. We'll be more joint, we will have more of the funds the Department receives from the taxpayers of the United States focused on where they're needed
.


OK for those of you that did not understand what he said, he said WE ARE NOT DOWNSIZING BUT INCREASING BY 30,000 TROOPS. Is that plain enough for you? The ,military is top heavy and by closing the bases and realigning the organization of the units you can actually increase the actual fighting forces. The guy/gal on the ground. If your troops are located in fewer places, it takes less to support them as you not send things all over the place. So to put the downsizing to rest, we are increasing the size of the Army and Marines, not decreasing.


Comments
on Jun 02, 2005
I think with our current situation in the world, it would be very UNWISE to downsize anyway. Someone's going to pummel us...I guarantee.
on Jun 02, 2005


#1 by Marcie Helen
Thursday, June 02, 2005


I think with our current situation in the world, it would be very UNWISE to downsize anyway. Someone's going to pummel us...I guarantee.


No, they'll "try" to. They will will NOT succeed
on Jun 02, 2005
The ,military is top heavy and by closing the bases and realigning the organization of the units you can actually increase the actual fighting forces.


As a military spouse, I have an issue with the military being 'top heavy'. From my perspective, we're not. My husband's unit is having to borrow personnel from other squadrons and bases in order to cover the day to day operating requirements for this installation.

This force reshaping is a godsend, literally. Less bases, same number of personnel means more people to man the missions at the remaining bases/installations. It can't happen too soon, as far as I'm concerned.

People hear about base closings and automatically think that the military is downsizing, and that's just not true.

Good article!
on Jun 02, 2005
I think with our current situation in the world, it would be very UNWISE to downsize anyway. Someone's going to pummel us...I guarantee.


Wow they have you hook, line and sinker.

Please do tell, who is going to Pummel us?
Attacks by terrorist do not count as Pummels, so what foreign nation is going to suddenly Jump us when we "downsize" ?

on Jun 09, 2005
Hey dharmagrl,

No offense intended. By "top heavy" I refer to too many higher ranking officers for the number of units and logistic positions. Like having a Major act as an aid to Col when a 2ndLt or SFC. would do the same job normally. They have actually had to realign the ranks of some positions to make room for more high officer ranks. They are doing jobs that used to be done by NCO"s and such. I agree that there is a shortage in some units of "real" working men/women.

The re-alignment like you said will make it much better as people, boots on the ground, working stiffs, whatever you want to call them will be around to get the job done.

I know I have said it before but thanks dharmgrl, for your husband and your sacrifice. I know its hard, I want you to know I think everyday about our men/women in the military and their families, and I thank GOD for them everyday.