This is my personal view and comments on the issues and events that I feel a need to talk about or express my view. You don't have to agree, but lets carry on a adult, discussion and maybe you will see it the right way, mine. ;)
I would rather hear about him then Woodruff...
Published on January 31, 2006 By ShadowWar In Current Events

Back on Jan 16th I wrote a story about Marine Gunnery Sgt. Michael Burghardt. He was injured when a IED exploded while he was trying to disarm it. 

Burghardt, of Huntington Beach, Calif., started his third tour in Iraq trying to beat the insurgents to the IEDs - improvised explosive devices - and disarm them before the insurgents could set them off.

As is often the case, Burghardt and his Explosive Ordnance Disposal team were accompanied to a bomb site Monday by the First Platoon, 167th Cavalry of the Nebraska National Guard.

One IED had blown up a Bradley fighting vehicle and killed a U.S. soldier. As often happens, the insurgents left behind more IEDs. Burghardt disarmed two bombs that were found - quick action that probably saved the lives of several Nebraska soldiers.

But he couldn't get to a third.

When word spread that the third device had been found, 167th Capt. Jeff Searcey of Kearney, 1st Lt. Matthew Misfeldt of Omaha and their men hit the ground as a blast exploded skyward.

Burghardt was wounded.

But with two new young Marines in his ordnance disposal unit - and the insurgent attackers undoubtedly looking on - "I didn't want them to see the team leader carried away on a stretcher," he said.

So after the Nebraskans tended to wounds that reached from his boot tops to the small of his back, Burghardt rose to his feet and reached back with a one-finger salute for his attackers.

With all the coverage of Mr. Woodruff's IED injuries, I think it would be a much more interesting story to follow Gunnery Sgt. Michael Burghardt's treatment and recovery. SInce he is part of the real story, not just covering it and getting caught up in it. I am sorry if this sounds cold, but I am tired of the coverage of this reporters non-story and would like to see the press follow a real story, one of the troops that are injured, medivaced and treated, through the recovery and finally the return home. That would be a real story.

 



Site Meter


Listed on BlogShares
Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Jan 31, 2006
I wouldn't consider the reporter's injuries a non-story.

As I said in my reply to your other article, a large number of people feel familiar with the people they see reporting the news. Of course they care, and of course they're interesting. It's a very serious injury, and it happened to someone many viewers feel like they "know".

I've seen many news reports that have detailed the injuries and recovery of our service members. It's interesting to me as an American, and especially as the wife of a Soldier.

However, with service members, all but friends and family and brothers in arms see a wounded service member as a stranger. There's less interest in stories about strangers than there is in stories about people we know or are familiar with.

You seem really upset about the news coverage of a gravely injured reporter in Iraq, and I respect your feelings and your opinion, but I'm having a hard time understanding why this is such a big deal.

Of course it's news.
on Jan 31, 2006
Oh, BTW, I'm completely honored that you put me on your sidebar blog list. Thanks.
on Jan 31, 2006

Hey TW,

I understand the interest, I guess I am mad because I see the lack of coverage of our men and women in uniform. Not just their injuries and recovery, but any coverage. Here is a guy as you say, and I agree, many know, and his story coverage becomes a story in and of itself.

I am mad because the lack of coverage of our guys and gals and anything positive about them. The way they cover the reporters story you would think he is the only one that has been injured by an IED. If anything good comes out of this it may be that they start talking about the others injured.

They talked about the 220 other attacks that day, but they forgot to mention the almost 300 IED's that week that were found and disarmed. I am just getting so pissed at the lopsided coverage thats all, and I guess its showing. I mean no disresect to the man injured, just to the media that makes it seem like its a vitally important issue.

No offense intended. Oh and your welcome.

on Feb 01, 2006
Actually, I dont think most Americans identify with reporters.  But the press does, and they are the ones that write the stories.  I would rather see a story on this Marine's recoveries than daily (hourly) briefs on a reporter.
on Feb 01, 2006
Actually, I dont think most Americans identify with reporters. But the press does, and they are the ones that write the stories. I would rather see a story on this Marine's recoveries than daily (hourly) briefs on a reporter.


I couldn't agree more! I really thought it over the top when they had live coverage of Woodruff being transported. Come on, is that really necessary? I would have loved to see the picture you (shadow) displayed here.
on Feb 01, 2006
Neither of your links are working.
on Feb 01, 2006
Burghardt's story would have certainly made an interesting piece to report on. I'm sure a lot of us would have been interested to see how he's doing. I'm glad he survived. I know it's terribly hard and I understand why you're upset. It was news when it happened to them, the reporters getting hurt and it is good to know they survived but it's time to stop focusing so much on it. I doubt if that will be the end of it though because as Tex said many people are familiar with him because he's on TV a lot and it's almost as if he's known personnaly. Plus he's an anchorman, so of course he's going to be focussed on.

But as I said before, them both being injured brings the focus back where it belongs and I'm sure there will be many a programs looking at these devices that are so deadly. I actually did see one such report on the IEDs and I'm sure this is a result of what happened.
on Feb 01, 2006


Reply By: davad70Posted: Wednesday, February 01, 2006
Neither of your links are working.

Just tried them and they seem fine Davad. Try them again.. in a web browser. 

on Feb 01, 2006
How about all these people that feel the same way that I do , maybe just not as strongly -
Link_1093777.php/Some_US_troops_question_Woodruff_coverage
Link_2125109.shtml


As much as I hate to say this. I have to agree with Davad70 on this. I couldn't get either of your links to work either. The first says the story I'm looking for has either been moved or deleted. The second just says page not found. And before you say it, I "am" using a web browser! The comment you made to davad70 was not very nice. You have to be running a browser to read JU don't you?
on Feb 01, 2006
I got the same as drmiler.
on Feb 01, 2006
How about all these people that feel the same way that I do , maybe just not as strongly -
Link_1093777.php/Some_US_troops_question_Woodruff_coverage
Link_2125109.shtml

The problem is JU's conversion of HTTP entries as links ... it doesn't parse them very well. It ends the link early.

If you click on the LINK part of it and then copy/paste everything from the '_' to the end into the address bar, it'll work.

Also, Shadowwar - if you edit the comment and use the Link button (and paste the URL into it) the entire link will be clickable. Of course, if you edit it just put the closing tag for the hyperlink where it should've been all along.
on Feb 01, 2006

http://www.postchronicle.com/commentary/article_2125109.shtml Lets see if this works this time, same links again with and without the linking http://www.postchronicle.com/commentary/article_2125109.shtml and http://news.monstersandcritics.com/northamerica/article_1093777.php/Some_US_troops_question_Woodruff_coverage or http://news.monstersandcritics.com/northamerica/article_1093777.php/Some_US_troops_question_Woodruff_coverage

Hope that helps, sorry for the trouble..

on Feb 01, 2006

Hope that helps, sorry for the trouble..

I think it is the forums vs the regular JU page as I did not have a problem.  But there is the old (I know ancient as in me) cut and paste too!

on Feb 01, 2006
You know, the more I think about it...

I don't really have the perspective required to comment on this.

I don't watch much TV, and generally I watch CNN Headline News to catch up on what's going on (In addition to getting really bored with the way 24 hr news stations draw things out, I have to limit my intake of news for my own sanity). I haven't seen or read a thing about Woodruff (beyond googling up a news story on it after reading one of your blogs)...prolly because I haven't been watching.

It may sincerely be way over-the-top reporting.

I don't think it's out of line to report the story or to give updates on his condition. If they're constantly harping on it, though, and making it out to be the biggest tragedy imaginable, then I'm with you.

I'm not informed enough on this issue to really take a clear stance.
2 Pages1 2